« Constructive Complaining | Main | The Real United States Federal Deficit »

April 06, 2008

Making Executive Compensation Reward Long-Term Performance

Now, I'd just like to say I don't know the intricate details of most executive compensation packages, but I'd like to pose this as an idea on how to align pay and the long-term performance of the company. One thing I think people get too hung up on is what the change is in 12 months of pay and stock prices. Why should chief executives have their pay based-on just 12 months of information? If you want a firm to last for the long-term, wouldn't you want to compensate them based-on long-term performance, such as improvement over the last 2, 3, 5, or 10 years? Then there's also the question of how much impact did the chief executive actually have on a firm. If an oil companies profits go up 4x because the price of oil went up 4x, there is no reason a chief executive should receive higher pay. But if profits go up 6x while oil prices go up 4x, then it would make sense for the chief executive to receive higher pay, so long as their competitors and peers saw lower profit growth.

So if you're on a compensation committee and want to create a compensation package that is good for both the chief executive and the shareholders, you should make sure to do a couple things:

1) Benchmark the performance of the firm
2) Reward the executive for long-term performance by staggering their stock options.

Point 1: Benchmarking
With benchmarking, it would be good to benchmark the firm against its competitors. If the company competes against many businesses across multiple products, it might get a little difficult, but would still be a good idea to ensure the benchmarks are done well. Other benchmarks that could be used would be new product offerings and how much growth they have generated, the productivity of the firm, the inputs or outputs of the firm (such as oil prices), and other performance measures that align with the firm's mission.

Point 2: Rewarding for long-term performance
You could also stagger the reward of the chief executive's stock options. For example:
In year 1: The chief executive receives 2 million stock options for performance. 20% of those begin on a vesting schedule starting with the day of compensation, the other options begin vesting after years 2, 3, 4, and 5, if their future performance targets are hit. For the options that begin vesting in the future years, the compensation committee will review the performance target again in each of those years over the entire time period of 2-5 years and will decide then on whether the stock options should begin to vest. If the performance targets are not achieved, the stock options will be destroyed.

In each additional year, the chief executive would also receive additional options that would follow under the same schedule and adjusted for their date of issue. This way the firm's incentives for the chief executive are aligned to create long-term value, instead of just short-term gains.

Inspiration: A Brighter Spotlight, Yet the Pay Rises (NYTimes.com)


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341e8a9253ef00e551aed42b8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Making Executive Compensation Reward Long-Term Performance:

Comments

Oh goody, I get to be the first! Interesting subject. I'm in the process of wrapping up a course in my MBA program, specifically regarding the accounting of stock option grants. There is much hubbub regarding this issue, and most of the "real issues," seem to obfuscated quite well. (Never let it be said that corporate America, hasn't successfully "influenced," our education process, as well) If you are interested in particulars let me know. Anyway, whether it is an illusion or not, there still seems to be quite a clamor for effective upper-executives, and some of the suggestions you made make sense to me as well, such as staggering, though there are some underpinning accounting issues, that can dramatically effect Income Statement reporting, cash flow management, as to the tax ramifications of how options grants are costed out, and finally strategies for executive compensation to begin with. At the end of the day however, striking a balance with this issue is even more interesting,as the needs of each party is dramatically divergent.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Powered by TypePad